An Unique Almanac in the Codex Madrid. A Mistakological Study

  • Jüngel P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The study of mistakes in Maya and, with certain evidence as well, in Mixtec and Nahua written sources, has entered a new stage when F. Lounsbury's study "A Palenque King and the Planet Jupiter" (1989: 246-259, esp. 246-248) appeared by opening a new subfield of Mayanist and Mexicanist research, which I've named "mistakology" in private use. Before, mistakes were recognized and just corrected as "writer's errors", since, it is obvious that mistakes --often, if not ever- are intended and meaningful and their ideas have to be analysed. Evidence for this is accumulating, and this especially from the study of Codex Madrid (CM) (Jüngel, 1991 & 1992), where countless mistakes are what has lead Mayanists to underrate the reliability of this document.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jüngel, P. (2013). An Unique Almanac in the Codex Madrid. A Mistakological Study. Estudios de Cultura Maya, 20. https://doi.org/10.19130/iifl.ecm.1999.20.447

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free