Direct measurement of atmospheric dry deposition to natural surfaces in a semiarid region of north central India

29Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Dry deposition flux of major ions (Na +, K +, Ca 2+, Mg 2+, NH 4 +, F -, Cl -, NO 3 - and SO 4 2-) to natural surfaces e.g., leaf of Ashok (Polyalthia longifolia) and Cassia (Cassia siamea), were determined at Dayalbagh, a suburban site of semiarid region. Dry deposition flux was highest for Ca 2+ on both Ashok and Cassia while lowest for Na + on Ashok leaf and F - on Cassia leaf. Overall average dry deposition fluxes varied from 0.27 mg m -2 d -1 to 3.98 mg m -2 d -1. The deposition was comparatively higher to Cassia leaf than Ashok. The high deposition flux to Cassia leaf may be due to surface roughness as shown by scanning electron micrographs. The sum of major cations (Na +, K +, Ca 2+, Mg 2+) and NH 4 + was higher than sum of major anions (F -, Cl -, NO 3 - and SO 4 2-). It indicates that dry deposition at present site is alkaline in nature and difference in the sum of major cations and major anions might be due to unmeasured carbonate and bicarbonate ions as well as organic anions (formate and acetate). Deposition flux of SO 4 2- and NO 3 - is relatively lower than Ca 2+ and Mg 2+. Seasonally dry deposition fluxes were higher in monsoon or summer for cationic species while for anionic species fluxes were higher in winter or monsoon. Average dry deposition velocity of major ions on Ashok and Cassia leaf varied from 0.41 to 2.36 cm s -1, while seasonally values varied from 0.32 to 4.04 cm s -1. The variation in deposition velocity may be due to meteorological conditions and surface characteristics. Copyright 2003 by the American Geophysical Union.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kumar, R., Rani, A., Kumari, K. M., & Srivastava, S. S. (2003). Direct measurement of atmospheric dry deposition to natural surfaces in a semiarid region of north central India. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 108(20). https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003194

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free