Insurance Coverage for Non-standard Workers: Experiences of Temporary Workers, Freelancers, and Part-time Workers in the USA, 2010–2017

4Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate insurance disparities across non-standard employment categories and to determine how coverage disparities shifted following health reform in 2014. Methods: We analyzed nationally representative data on working-age adults from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) (2010–2012 and 2015–2017, N=79,182) to estimate insurance rates across three groups of non-standard workers (full-time temporary workers, freelancers, and part-time workers) compared to standard workers. Results: Uninsurance decreased after health reform for all groups of non-standard workers, ranging from a 10.0- to 14.3-percentage point decline (p<0.001). Yet, uninsurance rates remained high for freelancers (30.8%), full-time temporary workers (25.1%), and part-time workers (17.9%) relative to standard workers (11.9%) in 2015–2017 (p<0.001). Residence in a Medicaid expansion state was associated with lower uninsurance rates for all categories of workers. Conclusions: Workers in non-standard jobs continue to face challenges obtaining health insurance coverage. Our findings highlight the continued high risk of uninsurance for full-time temporary workers and freelancers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Berdahl, T. A., & Moriya, A. S. (2021). Insurance Coverage for Non-standard Workers: Experiences of Temporary Workers, Freelancers, and Part-time Workers in the USA, 2010–2017. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 36(7), 1997–2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06700-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free