Can a Situational Judgment Test Identify Trainees at Risk of Professionalism Issues? A Multi-Institutional, Prospective Cohort Study

9Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose To determine whether overall situational judgment test (SJT) scores are associated with programs' clinical competency committee (CCC) ratings of trainee professionalism, any concerning behavior, and concerning behavior requiring active remediation at 2 time periods. Method In fall 2019, trainees from 17 U.S. programs (16 residency, 1 fellowship) took an online 15-scenario SJT developed to measure 7 dimensions of professionalism. CCC midyear and year-end (6 months and 1 year following SJT completion, respectively) professionalism scores and concern ratings were gathered for academic year 2019-2020. Analyses were conducted to determine whether overall SJT scores related to overall professionalism ratings, trainees displaying any concerns, and trainees requiring active remediation at both time periods. Results Overall SJT scores correlated positively with midyear and year-end overall professionalism ratings (r =.21 and.14, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cullen, M. J., Zhang, C., Sackett, P. R., Thakker, K., & Young, J. Q. (2022). Can a Situational Judgment Test Identify Trainees at Risk of Professionalism Issues? A Multi-Institutional, Prospective Cohort Study. Academic Medicine, 97(10), 1494–1503. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004756

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free