Pengaruh Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor, Risiko Audit, Pengalaman Audit, Keahlian, Dan Independensi Terhadap Ketepatan Pemberian Opini Audit

  • Christiani A
  • Kurnia R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the impact of between the auditor's professional skepticism, audit risk, audit experience, audit expertise, and independence with the accuracy of audit opinion by public accountant.  This research done by survey method the responden are senior auditors, supervisors, managers, and partners in public accountant office in Jakarta and Tangerang. The samples were taken by non-probability sampling method with using convenience sampling. The total samples used in analysis are 102 responden. Data analysis conducted by using multiple regression. Hypothesis testing to determine whether any significant relationship between auditor's professional skepticism, audit risk, audit experience, audit expertise, and independence with the accuracy of audit opinion by public accountant.  The result of hypothesis testing showed that professional skepticism, auditors, audit risk, the audit experience, expertise, and independence as simultaneously have significant influence to the accuracy of audit opinion by public accountant. Meanwhile, only audit experience and independence has significant influence to the accuracy of audit opinion by public accountant. Other three variables, which auditor's professional skepticism, audit risk, audit expertise have no significant influence to the accuracy of audit opinion by public accountant. Keyword: auditor's professional skepticism, audit risk, audit experience, audit expertise, and independence with the accuracy of audit opinion by public accountant.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Christiani, A. P., & Kurnia, R. (2012). Pengaruh Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor, Risiko Audit, Pengalaman Audit, Keahlian, Dan Independensi Terhadap Ketepatan Pemberian Opini Audit. Ultimaccounting Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 4(1), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.31937/akuntansi.v4i1.135

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free