Additively Combining Utilities and Beliefs: Research Gaps and Algorithmic Developments

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Value-based decision making in complex environments, such as those with uncertain and volatile mapping of reward probabilities onto options, may engender computational strategies that are not necessarily optimal in terms of normative frameworks but may ensure effective learning and behavioral flexibility in conditions of limited neural computational resources. In this article, we review a suboptimal strategy – additively combining reward magnitude and reward probability attributes of options for value-based decision making. In addition, we present computational intricacies of a recently developed model (named MIX model) representing an algorithmic implementation of the additive strategy in sequential decision-making with two options. We also discuss its opportunities; and conceptual, inferential, and generalization issues. Furthermore, we suggest future studies that will reveal the potential and serve the further development of the MIX model as a general model of value-based choice making.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ghambaryan, A., Gutkin, B., Klucharev, V., & Koechlin, E. (2021). Additively Combining Utilities and Beliefs: Research Gaps and Algorithmic Developments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.704728

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free