Contemporaneous and asymmetric volume-return relationship: Cross-product evidence from an emerging market

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that both Taiwan's exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and equities exhibit an asymmetric volumereturn relationship in which the ETF display a mixed, negative or positive, asymmetry and the equity exhibits primarily a positive asymmetry. The positive asymmetry in equities and its decline with the progressive elimination of the shortsale restriction on equities support the costly short-sale hypothesis, which considers a costly short-sale restriction or asymmetric transaction costs on long and short trading to be the source of the asymmetry. The part of a less positive asymmetry in ETFs also consists with what the costly short-sale hypothesis predicts. The later information models that consider asymmetrically-informed traders or the heterogeneity of traders to be the source of the asymmetry explain the negative asymmetry in ETFs and the upward trend in the magnitude of volume-return correlation with the grow of volume quantiles. An important conclusion is that not a single hypothesis can be a universal explanation for the asymmetric volume-return relationship. Which hypothesis may explain the volume-return asymmetry depends largely on whether the short-sale restriction is present.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lin, J. C. (2016). Contemporaneous and asymmetric volume-return relationship: Cross-product evidence from an emerging market. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 13(1), 92–111. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.13(1).2016.09

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free