Risk stratification of ulcer-like projection in uncomplicated acute type B aortic intramural haematoma

8Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the morphological evolution and risk stratification of ulcer-like projection (ULP) in patients with uncomplicated acute type B aortic intramural haematoma. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients with uncomplicated acute type B intramural haematoma admitted in our institution from January 2015 to June 2020. The primary end points were adverse aortic events (AAE), including aortic rupture, aortic dissection, aortic aneurysm and ULP enlargement. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 140 patients, including 62 (44%) and 78 (56%) patients with and without initial ULP, respectively. AAE occurred in 13 patients (9%) in the early term and 42 patients (33%) in the mid-term. Compared with patients without ULP, patients with initial ULP had no significant difference in early outcomes but a higher mid-term AAE rate [8% vs 11%, odds ratio (OR) 1.5, P = 0.47; 17% vs 55%, OR 6.0, P < 0.001]. Significantly higher AAE rate was observed in patients with high-risk ULP (depth ≥5.0 mm and located in the proximal aortic segments) than those with only low-risk ULP (depth <5.0 mm and/or located in the distal aortic segments) (87% vs 51%, OR 6.2, P = 0.014). In the multivariable analysis, high-risk ULP was an independent predictor of AAE (hazard ratio 2.8, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk ULP is a rapidly evolving entity and a marker of AAE despite optimal medical therapy. Therefore, close follow-up and prompt intervention are recommended for patients with high-risk ULP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, L., Yang, F., Liu, J., Luo, S., Yuan, H., Fan, R., … Luo, J. (2021). Risk stratification of ulcer-like projection in uncomplicated acute type B aortic intramural haematoma. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 60(5), 1032–1040. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezab249

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free