An indirect comparison of intravenous and subcutaneous belimumab efficacy in patients with SLE and high disease activity

5Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: To compare the efficacy of intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) belimumab plus standard therapy in patients with active, autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus and high disease activity (HDA). Patients & methods: An indirect treatment comparison using patient-level data of patients with HDA from three belimumab IV Phase III randomized controlled trials (BLISS-52 [BEL110751]; BLISS-76 [BEL110752]; Northeast Asia study [BEL113750]) and one belimumab SC randomized controlled trial (BLISS-SC [BEL112341]). Results: Similar efficacy results were identified between the belimumab formulations and greater improvements in efficacy endpoints were observed for both formulations compared with placebo. Conclusion: This indirect treatment comparison provides further evidence of the efficacy of belimumab IV and SC in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and HDA, compared with standard therapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ramachandran, S., Parks, D., Kurtinecz, M., Roth, D. A., & Alfonso-Cristancho, R. (2018). An indirect comparison of intravenous and subcutaneous belimumab efficacy in patients with SLE and high disease activity. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 7(6), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2017-0085

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free