Validation of a chicken wing training model for endoscopic microsurgical dissection

16Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: To determine if training with a chicken wing model improves performance of endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) with microvascular dissection. Study Design: Randomized experimental study. Methods: A single-blinded randomized clinical trial of trainees with various levels of endoscopic experience was conducted to determine if prior training on a nonhuman model augments endoscopic skill and efficiency in a surrogate model for live surgery. Medical students, residents, and fellows were randomized to two groups: a control group that performed an endoscopic transantral internal maxillary artery dissection on a silicone-injected anatomical specimen, and an interventional group that underwent microvascular dissection training on a chicken wing model prior to performing the anatomic dissection on the cadaver specimen. Time to completion and quality of dissection were measured. Results: A Mann-Whitney test demonstrated a significant improvement in time and quality outcomes respectively across all interventional groups, with the greatest improvements seen in participants with less endoscopic experience: medical students (P5.032, P5.008), residents and fellows (P5.016, P5.032). Conclusions: Prior training on the chicken wing model improves surgical performance in a surrogate model for live EES.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kaplan, D. J., Vaz-Guimaraes, F., Fernandez-Miranda, J. C., & Snyderman, C. H. (2015). Validation of a chicken wing training model for endoscopic microsurgical dissection. Laryngoscope, 125(3), 571–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24977

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free