Abstract
Quite a few patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) are refractory to H1-antihistamines, even though the dose of H1-antihistamines is increased up to 4-fold. CSU that is not controlled with H1-antihistamines results in increased disease burden. Several immunomodulators have been used to manage these patients. The guidelines reported herein are connected to Part 1 of the KAAACI/KDA Evidence-Based Practice Guidelines for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in Korean Adults and Children, and aimed to provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of H1-antihistamine-refractory CSU. Part 2 focuses on the more commonly used additional treatment options for refractory CSU, including omalizumab, cyclosporine, leukotriene receptor antagonist, dapsone, methotrexate, and phototherapy. The evidence to support their efficacy, dosing, safety, and selection of these agents is systematically reviewed. To date, for patients with refractory CSU, the methodologically sound data to evaluate the use of omalizumab has been growing; however, the evidence of other immunomodulators and phototherapy is still insufficient. Therefore, an individualized stepwise approach with a goal of achieving complete symptom control and minimizing side effects can be recommended. Larger controlled studies are needed to elevate the level of evidence to select a rational therapeutic agent for patients with refractory CSU.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Choi, J. H., Lee, D. H., Song, W. J., Choi, M., Kwon, J. W., Kim, G. W., … Park, Y. M. (2020). The KAAACI/KDA evidence-based practice guidelines for chronic spontaneous urticaria in Korean adults and children: Part 2. management of H1-antihistamine-refractory chronic Urticaria. Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Research. Korean Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Clinical Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2020.12.5.750
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.