Placism in nclb—how rural children are left behind

44Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

No Child Left Behind (NCLB) has been proclaimed by some as a reform that will improve education for students from all backgrounds, in all locations. The main components of NCLB, however, are biased against students in small and rural schools. This bias, called “placism,” discriminates against people based on where they live. This rural incompatibility is evident in NCLB's accountability provisions, sanctions, and highly qualified teacher provisions. Problems in these areas are the result of ignoring, or distorting, the realities of rural schooling. The accountability provisions are constructed so that small schools will frequently be incorrectly labeled as failing. The sanctions, inappropriate for rural areas, fail to provide solutions to existing rural challenges. The “highly qualified” teacher provisions make it more difficult, not easier, for rural districts to attract and retain competent teachers. Unless these injustices are corrected, NCLB will serve to decrease educational quality for rural students. © University of Massachusetts Amherst School of Education.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jimerson, L. (2005). Placism in nclb—how rural children are left behind. Equity and Excellence in Education, 38(3), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680591002588

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free