Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Breast Implant Rupture Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

17Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Breast augmentation is the most common aesthetic operation performed in the United States and worldwide; 1,862,506 breast augmentation procedures were performed in 2018, an increase of 27.6 percent compared to 2014 data. Methods: In the present study, the authors performed a systematic review to identify the accuracy of ultrasonography for diagnosing breast prosthesis rupture. Studies in which the ultrasound diagnostic test was compared to a surgical finding as a reference standard were reviewed. Results: As a result, 20 primary studies were included in the analyses, with a total of 1987 patients and 3297 prostheses. The use of ultrasound for diagnosis of breast prosthesis rupture presented the following results: pooled sensitivity, 73.7 percent (95 percent CI, 70.2 to 77.1 percent); pooled specificity, 87.8 percent (95 percent CI, 86.5 to 89.0); area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.7762; diagnostic odds ratio, 11.04 (95 percent CI, 5.79 to 21.08). Conclusion: This study supports that ultrasound of breast prostheses is an adequate tool in the diagnosis of rupture.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lacerda Macedo, A. C., Carvalho, G., Uggioni, M. L. R., Bavaresco, D. V., Simon, C. S., Cruz, M., … Rosa, M. I. (2021). Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Breast Implant Rupture Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 148(5), 939–947. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008408

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free