Maintaining face-to-face contact during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal qualitative investigation in UK primary care

Abstract

Background: In March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic required a rapid reconfiguration of UK general practice to minimise face-to-face contact with patients to reduce infection risk. However, some face-toface contact remained necessary and practices needed to ensure such contact could continue safely. Aim: To examine how practices determined when face-to-face contact was necessary and how faceto-face consultations were reconfigured to reduce COVID-19 infection risk. Design & setting: Qualitative interview study in general practices in Bristol, North Somerset, and South Gloucestershire. Method: Longitudinal semi-structured interviews with clinical and managerial practice staff were undertaken at four timepoints between May and July 2020. Results: Practices worked flexibly within general national guidance to determine when face-to-face contact with patients was necessary, influenced by knowledge of the patient, experience, and practice resilience. For example, practices prioritised patients according to clinical need using face-to-face contact to resolve clinician uncertainty or provide adequate reassurance to patients. To make face-toface contact as safe as possible and keep patients separated, practices introduced a heterogeneous range of measures that exploited features of their indoor and outdoor spaces, and altered their appointment processes. As national restrictions eased in June and July, the number and proportion of patients seen face to face generally increased. However, the reconfiguration of buildings and processes reduced the available capacity and put increased pressure on practices. Conclusion: Practices responded rapidly and creatively to the initial lockdown restrictions. The variety of ways practices organised face-to-face contact to minimise infection highlights the need for flexibility in guidance.