Embedded Implicatures and Experimental Constraints: A Reply to Geurts & Pouscoulous and Chemla

  • Sauerland U
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Experimental evidence on embedded implicatures by Chemla (2009b) and Geurts & Pouscoulous (2009a) has fewer theoretical consequences than assumed: On the one hand, the evidence successfully argues against obligatory local implicature computation, which has however already been discredited. On the other hand, the data are fully consistent with optional local implicature computation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sauerland, U. (2010). Embedded Implicatures and Experimental Constraints: A Reply to Geurts & Pouscoulous and Chemla. Semantics and Pragmatics, 3. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.3.2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free