Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Neurocognitive Functions in Moderate and Severe Depression: A Longitudinal Study

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to investigate the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on depressive symptoms and neurocognitive functions during treatment and follow-up. Methods: A total of 65 patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder, with a >16 scores in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D) and a >18 scores in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), participated in the study. The Ham-D, BDI, Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Trail Making Tests A and B, Stroop Colour and Word Test, Number Sequence Test, Öktem Verbal Memory Processes Test, and Verbal Fluency Test were administered at baseline, 1st-, and 3rd-month for both treatment and control groups. Results: A total of 65 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 25 in the TMS group and 26 in the non-TMS group completed the follow-up. At the first month, 73.5% of patients in the TMS group showed a full treatment response, compared to 29.03% in the non-TMS group (p=0.001). At the third month, the treatment response rate decreased to 40% in the TMS group, whereas it was 42.3% in the non-TMS group, and the significant difference between the groups disappeared (p=0.918). In terms of cognitive functions, no significant changes were observed in either group at the first- and third-month follow-ups compared to baseline. Conclusion: TMS had a strong acute antidepressant effect; however, this effect diminished over time during the follow-up period. Although partial improvement was observed in cognitive functions, this improvement did not reach statistical significance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Si̇Nanoğlu, G. K., Güler, Ö., & Çaliş, Z. (2025). Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Neurocognitive Functions in Moderate and Severe Depression: A Longitudinal Study. Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 36, 439–449. https://doi.org/10.5080/u27539

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free