Verisimilitude (or "truthlikeness") as an alternative to pro and cons: Migraine and cluster headache mechanisms

4Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Calculating verisimilitude (or "truthlikeness") ad modum Popper is a quantitative alternative to the usual pros and cons in migraine and cluster headache mechanisms. The following items were evaluated: dilation of large cranial arteries during migraine; CGRP increase during migraine; migraine as a brain disorder; aura and migraine headache; brain stem activation during migraine; rCBF in migraine without aura; NO and pathophysiology of migraine; neurogenic inflammation and migraine; aura in cluster headache; and hypothalamic activation in cluster headache. It is concluded that verisimilitude calculations can be helpful when judging pathophysiological problems in migraine and cluster headache. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tfelt-Hansen, P. C. (2010, October). Verisimilitude (or “truthlikeness”) as an alternative to pro and cons: Migraine and cluster headache mechanisms. Journal of Headache and Pain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10194-010-0232-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free