Visual functions affecting stereopsis in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To quantify stereopsis and other visual functions in patients with unilateral branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and to investigate vision-related parameters that affect stereopsis. Design: Prospective observational study. Subjects: Forty-five patients undergoing intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) treatment for unilateral BRVO. Methods: We examined stereopsis using the Titmus stereo test (TST) and TNO stereotest (TNO), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), letter contrast sensitivity, severity of metamorphopsia and degree of aniseikonia before and 6 months after IVR. Main outcome measures: Visual functions that affect stereopsis. Results: Baseline stereopsis in patients with BRVO was 2.7 ± 0.6 (range, 1.6–3.5) in the TST and 2.8 ± 0.5 (range, 1.8–3.3) in TNO. TST and TNO scores were significantly correlated with BCVA and letter contrast sensitivity at baseline (P < 0.001) but not with other visual functions. IVR treatment significantly improved stereopsis, BCVA, and letter contrast sensitivity. After treatment, TST scores were significantly correlated with BCVA (P < 0.001), letter contrast sensitivity (P < 0.001), and aniseikonia (P < 0.01). TNO scores were significantly correlated with BCVA (P < 0.01) and letter contrast sensitivity (P < 0.01). TST and TNO scores after treatment were significantly correlated with BCVA at baseline (P < 0.01 for both). Conclusions: Deterioration of stereopsis in patients with BRVO was associated with changes in visual acuity and contrast sensitivity after treatment. Initial visual acuity is a prognostic factor for posttreatment stereopsis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morikawa, S., Okamoto, F., Murakami, T., Sugiura, Y., Hiraoka, T., & Oshika, T. (2022). Visual functions affecting stereopsis in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion. Eye (Basingstoke), 36(2), 457–462. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01452-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free