Comparison of two devices for respiratory impedance measurement using a forced oscillation technique: Basic study using phantom models

42Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Since commercial forced oscillation technique (FOT) devices became available, they have been widely used for physiological assessments, mainly of obstructive lung diseases. However, it is not known whether the impedance values measured with different devices are identical. In this study, two FOT devices - the impulse oscillometry system (IOS) and the MostGraph (MG) - were compared using phantom models. The resistance values varied up to 10 % from estimated values in both devices. Additionally, there was a difference in frequency dependence for the resistance between the devices. The reactance values measured with MG were higher than those measured with IOS. The effects of ventilation on the measured impedance values were higher for IOS than for MG, especially at lower frequencies. We concluded that the devices do not always generate identical impedance values. Thus, differences between the devices should be taken into consideration when evaluating clinical data. © 2014 The Physiological Society of Japan and Springer Japan.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tanimura, K., Hirai, T., Sato, S., Hasegawa, K., Muro, S., Kurosawa, H., & Mishima, M. (2014). Comparison of two devices for respiratory impedance measurement using a forced oscillation technique: Basic study using phantom models. Journal of Physiological Sciences, 64(5), 377–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12576-014-0329-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free