Peritoneal irrigation vs suction alone during pediatric appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: A meta-analysis

20Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background:There currently exists no substantial evidence reporting the efficacy of peritoneal irrigation in reducing the incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess in pediatric patients. The purpose of our study was to perform a meta-analysis to compare rates of intra-abdominal abscess after appendectomy between irrigation and suction alone groups.Methods:We identified studies by a systematic search in EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to recognize randomized controlled trials and case control studies from the 1950 to May 2019. We limited the English language studies. We checked the reference list of studies to recognize other potentially qualified trials. We analyzed the merged data with use of the Review Manager 5.3.Results:We identified 6 eligible papers enrolling a total of 1633 participants. We found no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative intraabdominal abscess, wound infection, and the length of hospitalization between 2 group, but duration of surgery is longer in irrigation group (MD=6.76, 95% CI=4.64 to 8.87, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bi, L. W., Yan, B. L., Yang, Q. Y., & Cui, H. L. (2019). Peritoneal irrigation vs suction alone during pediatric appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: A meta-analysis. Medicine (United States). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018047

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free