Equity of the essential public health service in rural China: Evidence from a nationwide survey of hypertensive patients

22Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives:To explore healthcare disparities in rural China two years after the implementation of the Essential Public Health Service (EPHS) reform in 2009. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted by surveying 930 hypertension patients (HPs) from different regions in rural China in 2011. The percentages of patients using recommended four or more follow-up visits in a year were calculated by patient socio-demographic characteristics and statistically examined using chi-square and logistic regression to uncover disparities and correlated factors in EPHS use. Results: The rates were not significantly different by age, gender, education, insurance status or income, but significantly different by region and hypertension history (p < 0.01). Higher rates were also observed on patients who sought actively follow-up service at clinics, making appointment for the next follow-up with doctors, awareness of the need of follow-up, more satisfied with the follow-up services, and better medication adherence (p < 0.01). Conclusions: There were no disparities observed among HPs in the use of follow-up services, suggesting that the reform has to some extent achieved its goal in ensuring equal access to EPHS. In this regard, regional implementation of the national policies and improvement of EPHS management at local level should be further improved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhou, D., Feng, Z., He, S., Sun, X., Ma, C., Lv, B., & Zou, X. (2013). Equity of the essential public health service in rural China: Evidence from a nationwide survey of hypertensive patients. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.294.3773

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free