Comparison of fluorescent BACTEC 9000 MB system, Septi-Chek AFB system, and Lowenstein-Jensen medium for detection of mycobacteria

42Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The newly developed fluorescent BACTEC 9000 MB system for automated culture of mycobacteria was compared with the Septi-Chek AFB system and Lowenstein-Jensen medium (LJ). A total of 2,005 clinical specimens were included in the study. Mycobacteria were isolated from 202 (10.1%) specimens, including 155 Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates and 47 Mycobacteria other than M. tuberculosis isolates. Of 131 isolates detected by the BACTEC system, the Septi-Chek AFB system, or both, 120 (91.6%) were detected by the BACTEC system and 105 (80.2%) were detected by the Septi-Chek AFB system (P < 0.02). The recovery rate in the BACTEC system compared with that in the Septi-Chek AFB system was significantly higher for M. tuberculosis complex isolates (P < 0.005) and for isolates from acid-fast smear-negative specimens (P < 0.01). Of 148 isolates detected by the BACTEC system, LJ, or both, 142 (95.9%) were detected by the BACTEC system and 118 (79.9%) were detected by LJ (P < 0.001). The recovery rate in the BACTEC system compared with that on LJ was significantly higher for M. tuberculosis complex isolates (P < 0.001). The BACTEC system detected more mycobacteria from both smear-positive and smear-negative specimens than LJ. The mean times to detection of mycobacteria were 17.6 days for the BACTEC system, 26.0 days for the Septi-Chek AFB system, and 29.4 days for LJ. The BACTEC fluorescent 9000 MB system is a rapid, sensitive, and efficient method for the isolation of mycobacteria.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Griethuysen, A. J., Jansz, A. R., & Buiting, A. G. M. (1996). Comparison of fluorescent BACTEC 9000 MB system, Septi-Chek AFB system, and Lowenstein-Jensen medium for detection of mycobacteria. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 34(10), 2391–2394. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.34.10.2391-2394.1996

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free