Remote and hybrid work models in post-pandemic organizations: A systematic review

  • Khamunde R
  • Mungai M
  • Ndolo J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the way people work, making remote and hybrid work arrangements in organizations around the world rise. This systematic review examines 17 studies (journals/articles) that were published between the years 2018 and 2025 to understand how such work arrangements have influenced the outcomes and what factors justify their continued use in a post-pandemic environment. We conducted these studies through literature reviews based on scholarly databases, following the guidelines provided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). One of the greatest findings in our research is that since 2020, remote and hybrid work arrangements have become increasingly common. This review seeks to address essential questions regarding the design of these work models, their implications for well-being, the challenges they raise, the modifications organizations should undertake, and the gaps requiring additional research. It provides a guide to developing sustainable hybrid work practices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khamunde, R. A., Mungai, M., & Ndolo, J. (2025). Remote and hybrid work models in post-pandemic organizations: A systematic review. African Quarterly Social Science Review, 2(4), 703–710. https://doi.org/10.51867/aqssr.2.4.64

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free