Scheduling meetings: are the odds in your favor?

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Abstract: Polling all the participants to find a time when everyone is available is the ubiquitous method of scheduling meetings nowadays. We examine the probability of a poll with m participants and ℓ possible meeting times succeeding, where each participant rejects r of the ℓ options. For large ℓ and fixed r/ℓ, we can carry out a saddle-point expansion and obtain analytical results for the probability of success. Despite the thermodynamic limit of large ℓ, the ‘microcanonical’ version of the problem where each participant rejects exactly r possible meeting times, and the ‘canonical’ version where each participant has a probability p=r/ℓ of rejecting any meeting time, only agree with each other if m→∞. For m→∞,ℓ has to be O(p-m) for the poll to succeed, i.e., the number of meeting times that have to be polled increases exponentially with m. Equivalently, as a function of p, there is a discontinuous transition in the probability of success at p∼1/ℓ1/m. If the participants’ availability is approximated as being unchanging from one week to another, i.e., ℓ is limited, a realistic example discussed in the text of the paper shows that the probability of success drops sharply if the number of participants is greater than approximately 4. Graphical abstract: (Figure presented.)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brown, K., Mathur, H., & Narayan, O. (2024). Scheduling meetings: are the odds in your favor? European Physical Journal B, 97(8). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/s10051-024-00742-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free