Philosophy of Desire 1: Aristotle and Thymós

4Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Whit the aim of clariflying what exactly is the human phenomenon of akrasía or incontinence in the fullest sense (namely, that caused by epithymia or appetite), in Nicomachean Ethics VII.4- 10 Aristotle introduces a type of incontinence by analogy, that is, incontinence due to thymós or courage. Despite his intentions, the explanation of the latter only complicates understanding the former, and the reader ends up without a clear understanding of either. The purpose of this article is to shed some light on the subject of akrasía due to thymós, trying, specifically, to answer three questions: (1) what exactly is this passion? (2) Who are worse, those who get carried away by their appetites (such as those who misbehave out of lust or gluttony) or those who get carried away by their anger (such as those who misbehave out of anger or jealousy), and why? Finally, (3) are we responsible for the mistakes we make in a fit of anger?.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ramos-Umaña, L. (2022). Philosophy of Desire 1: Aristotle and Thymós. Topicos (Mexico), (62), 65–95. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v62i0.1638

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free