Same question, different world: Replicating an open access research impact study

12Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To examine changes in the open access landscape over time, this study partially replicated Kristin Antelman’s 2004 study of open access citation advantage. Results indicated open access articles still have a citation advantage. For three of the four disciplines examined, the most common sites hosting freely available articles were independent sites, such as academic social networks or article-sharing sites. For the same three disciplines, more than 70 percent of the open access copies were publishers’ PDFs. The major difference from Antelman’s is the increase in the number of freely available articles that appear to be in violation of publisher policies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arendt, J., Peacemaker, B., & Miller, H. (2019). Same question, different world: Replicating an open access research impact study. College and Research Libraries, 80(3), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.3.303

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free