Left ventricular geometric patterns in end-stage kidney disease: Determinants and course over time

10Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: While concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (cLVH) predominates in non–dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD), eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy (eLVH) is most prevalent in dialysis-dependent CKD stage 5 (CKD5D). In these patients, the risk of sudden death is 5× higher than in individuals with cLVH. Currently, it is unknown which factors determine left ventricular (LV) geometry and how it changes over time in CKD5D. Methods: Data from participants of the CONvective TRAnsport Study who underwent serial transthoracic echocardiography were used. Based on left ventricular mass (LVM) and relative wall thickness (RWT), 4 types of left ventricular geometry were distinguished: normal, concentric remodeling, eLVH, and cLVH. Determinants of eLVH were assessed with logistic regression. Left ventricular geometry of patients who died and survived were compared. Long-term changes in RWT and LVM were evaluated with a linear mixed model. Findings: Three hundred twenty-two patients (63.1 ± 13.3 years) were included. At baseline, LVH was present in 71% (cLVH: 27%; eLVH: 44%). Prior cardiovascular disease (CVD) was positively associated with eLVH and ß-blocker use inversely. None of the putative volume parameters showed any relationship with eLVH. Although eLVH was most prevalent in non-survivors, the distribution of left ventricular geometry did not vary over time. Discussion: The finding that previous CVD was positively associated with eLVH may result from the permanent high cardiac output and the strong tendency for aortic valve calcification in this group of long-term hemodialysis patients, who suffer generally also from chronic anemia and various other metabolic derangements. No association was found between eLVH and parameters of fluid balance. The distribution of left ventricular geometry did not alter over time. The assumption that LV geometry worsens over time in susceptible individuals, who then suffer from a high risk of dying, may explain these findings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nubé, M. J., Hoekstra, T., Doganer, V., Bots, M. L., Blankestijn, P. J., van den Dorpel, M., … Grooteman, M. P. C. (2018). Left ventricular geometric patterns in end-stage kidney disease: Determinants and course over time. Hemodialysis International, 22(3), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.12644

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free