Unlawful Occupiers, Eviction and the National State of Disaster: Considering South Africa's Emergency Legislation and Jurisprudence during COVID-19

4Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article analyses how emergency regulations protected persons living in urban poverty, particularly unlawful occupiers, from eviction during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa. It is set against the socio-economic and environmental effects of unlawful occupiers being forced onto the streets through evictions. It examines the judicial interpretation and application of the COVID-19 regulations on the prohibition of the eviction of unlawful occupiers, together with remedies for compensation for demolished dwellings. Ultimately, the article shows that the regulatory and judicial responses to the pandemic were pro-poor and sought to protect human dignity, the right to life, and the right to an environment that is not detrimental to human health and well-being. The responses safeguarded access to housing at a time when many vulnerable people could have been rendered homeless by eviction and the demolition of their dwellings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dube, F., & Du Plessis, A. (2021). Unlawful Occupiers, Eviction and the National State of Disaster: Considering South Africa’s Emergency Legislation and Jurisprudence during COVID-19. Journal of African Law, 65(2), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855321000401

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free