Advanced statistics: How to determine whether your intervention is different, at least as effective as, or equivalent: A basic introduction

28Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The majority of studies published in the emergency medicine literature attempt to show a difference between two interventions, but often fail to do so. Failing to detect a difference, however, is not the same as demonstrating that one intervention is at least as effective as or better than the other intervention, or that the two interventions are equivalent - a fine point that is often overlooked. The purpose of this paper is to review classical hypothesis testing and then introduce the methodology to determine whether one intervention is at least as effective as another intervention, or whether two interventions are equivalent. Appreciating the conceptual differences between failing to find a difference, demonstrating that one intervention is at least as effective as another, and demonstrating equivalence may lead to a better understanding of the true significance or potential significance of study results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tamayo-Sarver, J. H., Albert, J. M., Tamayo-Sarver, M., & Cydulka, R. K. (2005). Advanced statistics: How to determine whether your intervention is different, at least as effective as, or equivalent: A basic introduction. Academic Emergency Medicine, 12(6), 536–542. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2005.01.010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free