INSTRUCTIONS AND GROUP VERSUS INDIVIDUAL REINFORCEMENT IN MODIFYING DISRUPTIVE GROUP BEHAVIOR 1

  • Herman S
  • Tramontana J
70Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Head Start children were matched into two groups on the basis of rates of disruptive behavior during rest periods. Attempts were made to modify their behavior using either individual or group token reinforcement procedures. While the reinforcement procedures reduced inappropriate behavior somewhat, the addition of instructions to the reinforcement reduced the inappropriate behavior to near zero for both groups. Instructions alone, however, were ineffective in controlling behavior. Type of reinforcement (group or individual) did not produce differential effects. While experimental control over the target behavior was demonstrated, there was little carryover from the experimental room to the regular classroom. Even when treatment was introduced into the regular class, follow‐up results showed that with time the target behavior approximated pretreatment levels. The results suggest that (a) the combination of instructions and reinforcement is much more effective than either one of these alone, (b) behavior change is specific to the environmental contingencies, and (c) the group reinforcement technique, which is much more easily implemented, was at least as effective as individual reinforcement in the present study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Herman, S. H., & Tramontana, J. (1971). INSTRUCTIONS AND GROUP VERSUS INDIVIDUAL REINFORCEMENT IN MODIFYING DISRUPTIVE GROUP BEHAVIOR 1. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4(2), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1971.4-113

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free