Abstract
Aim: To investigate the acceptability of a pilot scheme of revalidation to general dental practitioners. Method: Ten general dental practitioners completed portfolios of evidence of being up to date and fit to practise. This portfolio was assessed by a panel of three experts, using an assessment tool developed specifically for that purpose. An action research methodology was used to evaluate participants' perceptions, consisting of a focus group and semi-structured interviews. The views of the assessors on the portfolio and its assessment were collected using a questionnaire. Results: The views of the participants on revalidation, the pilot scheme portfolio and its use, who should assess it and how its use could be supported were collected. Also areas of difficulty in using the portfolio were identified, along with suggestions for improving it and alternative ways of evidencing competence. Assessors noted that the quality of evidence was adequate, but also made suggestions for improvement of the portfolio. Conclusions: The pilot scheme appears to have been acceptable to the dentists in this scheme, given some caveats. The assessors felt that appraisal would significantly enhance any substantive scheme. © British Dental Journal 2006.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Maidment, Y. G., Rennie, J. S., & Thomas, M. (2006). Revalidation of general dental practitioners in Scotland: The results of a pilot study Part 2 - Acceptability to practitioners. British Dental Journal, 200(8), 455–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813468
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.