Associations between complementary medicine utilisation and the use of contraceptive methods: Results of a national cross-sectional survey

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background and purpose: This study examines the relationship between the use of complementary medicine (CM) interventions or consultations with CM practitioners and women's choice of contraceptive method. Materials and methods: A secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey of Australian Women aged 34–39 years from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (ALSWH) was conducted. Associations between use of CM and contraception were analysed using Chi-squared tests and multivariate logistic regression. Results: Based on the responses from the included women (n = 7299), women who consulted a naturopath/herbalist were less likely to use implant contraceptives (OR 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33; 0.95). Those consulting a chiropractor (OR 1.54; 95%CI 1.05; 2.25) or an osteopath (OR 2.16; 95% CI 1.32; 3.54) were more likely to use natural contraception. Conclusion: There may be a link between women's choice of contraceptive method and their use of CM, in particular, with CM practitioner consultations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Steel, A., Wardle, J., Frawley, J., Adams, J., Sibbritt, D., & Lauche, R. (2018). Associations between complementary medicine utilisation and the use of contraceptive methods: Results of a national cross-sectional survey. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 33, 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.09.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free