Validity of self-reported hypertension and its determinants (the Bambuí study)

94Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective. Assessing the validity of self-reported hypertension and its determinants among adults living in the community was the objective of this study. Methods. A simple random sample of residents in the city of Bambuí, State of Minas Gerais, Brazil aged ≥18 years was selected. Three blood pressure measurements were performed in 970 inhabitants. Sensitivity, specificity as well as positive and negative predictive values of self-reported hypertension were assessed in relation to hypertension (mean blood pressure ≥90 or ≥140 mm Hg and/or present use of anti-hypertensive drugs). Results. Sensibility and specificity of self-reported hypertension were 72.1% (95% CI: 69.3-75.0) and 86.4% (95% CI: 84.3-88.6), respectively. Its prevalence was 27.2% (95% CI: 24.4-30.1), being reasonably similar to the prevalence of hypertension (23.3%; 95% CI: 20.7-26.1%). The validity of self-reported hypertension was higher among women, among individuals aged 40-59 and ≥60 years, among those who visited a doctor more recently (

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lima-Costa, M. F., Peixoto, S. V., & Firmo, J. O. A. (2004). Validity of self-reported hypertension and its determinants (the Bambuí study). Revista de Saude Publica, 38(5), 637–642. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-89102004000500004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free