Clinical criteria to screen for inpatient diagnostic errors: A scoping review

28Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Diagnostic errors are common and costly, but difficult to detect. "Trigger" tools have promise to facilitate detection, but have not been applied specifically for inpatient diagnostic error. We performed a scoping review to collate all individual "trigger" criteria that have been developed or validated that may indicate that an inpatient diagnostic error has occurred. We searched three databases and screened 8568 titles and abstracts to ultimately include 33 articles. We also developed a conceptual framework of diagnostic error outcomes using real clinical scenarios, and used it to categorize the extracted criteria. Of the multiple criteria we found related to inpatient diagnostic error and amenable to automated detection, the most common were death, transfer to a higher level of care, arrest or "code", and prolonged length of hospital stay. Several others, such as abrupt stoppage of multiple medications or change in procedure, may also be useful. Validation for general adverse event detection was done in 15 studies, but only one performed validation for diagnostic error specifically. Automated detection was used in only two studies. These criteria may be useful for developing diagnostic error detection tools.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shenvi, E. C., & El-Kareh, R. (2015, February 1). Clinical criteria to screen for inpatient diagnostic errors: A scoping review. Diagnosis. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2014-0047

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free