The prevalence in the general population of advance directives on euthanasia and discussion of end-of-life wishes: A nationwide survey Ethics, organization and policy

35Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: To determine the extent to which members of the general population have talked to their physician about their wishes regarding medical treatment at the end of life, to describe the prevalence of advance directives on euthanasia, and to identify associated factors. Method: This study used data from the cross-sectional Health Interview Study (HIS) 2008 that collected data from a representative sample (N = 9651) of the Belgian population. Results: Of all respondents, 4.4 % had spoken to their physician about their wishes regarding medical treatment at the end of life, while 1.8 % had an advance directive on euthanasia. Factors positively associated with discussions regarding wishes for medical treatment at the end of life were being female, being older in age, having poorer health status and having more GP contacts. People older than 55 years and living in Flanders or Brussels were more likely than the youngest age categories to have an advance directive on euthanasia. Conclusion: Younger people, men, people living in the Walloon region of Belgium, people without a longstanding illness, chronic condition or disability and people with few GP contacts could represent a target group for education regarding advance care planning. Public information campaigns and education of physicians may help to enable the public and physicians to engage more in advance care planning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Vleminck, A., Pardon, K., Houttekier, D., Van Den Block, L., Vander Stichele, R., & Deliens, L. (2015). The prevalence in the general population of advance directives on euthanasia and discussion of end-of-life wishes: A nationwide survey Ethics, organization and policy. BMC Palliative Care, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-015-0068-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free