Efficacy of additional surgical resection after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer

13Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Aim: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of additional surgical resection (ASR) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial esophageal cancer (SEC). Patients and Methods: Clinicopathological features and prognoses were analyzed in esophageal cancer (EC) cases with the indication for additional treatments (AT) after ESD (37 cases) and in cases that underwent primary resection (13 cases). Results: Sixteen out of 37 cases underwent ASR. The remaining 21 cases underwent other treatments or observation. Although all ASR cases are alive without recurrence, recurrence developed in 2 non-ASR cases. Residual tumors were detected in 2 ASR cases. All 4 cases were T1b and positive for lymph vessel invasion (ly+). No significant difference was observed in surgical outcomes between ASR and primary surgical resection (PSR) cases. Conclusion: AT need to be considered for T1b and ly+ cases, and ASR is one of the effective AT. The safety of ASR was similar to PSR for SEC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kudou, M., Shiozaki, A., Fujiwara, H., Konishi, H., Shoda, K., Arita, T., … Otsuji, E. (2017). Efficacy of additional surgical resection after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer. Anticancer Research, 37(9), 5301–5307. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.11956

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free