Intersite variability of CSF Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in clinical setting

66Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The assessment of total tau, phosphorylated tau (pTau-181) and amyloid beta (Ab 1-42) concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of subjects has been validated for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Although these measurements have shown some variability, little is known about their intersite variability in clinical settings. Methods: A total of 880 subjects (AD, n 5 515; non-AD, n 5 365) from three French memory centers were included. Receiver-operating characteristic analyses were performed to computerized area under curves (AUCs) and optimal thresholds for each biomarker in the three centers. A test-retest study was performed in a group of 32 CSF samples by repeated blind analysis of the three biomarkers using the same immunoassay batches in the three centers. Results: In the three centers, tau (AUC, 0.82-0.88) and pTau-181 (AUC, 0.83-0.89) outperformed Ab 1-42 (AUC, 0.70 -0.73) to discriminate subjects with AD from those without AD. An intersite variation of mean levels and cutoffs was observed for the three biomarkers. This variation was higher for Ab 1-42 (range of cutoff, 368-582 pg/mL) than for tau (range of cutoff, 289-353 pg/mL). In a test-retest study, the mean interlaboratory coefficients of variation were 12.2% for Ab 1-42, 11.3% for tau, and 11.5% for pTau-181. Conclusion: Intercenter variability of CSF biomarkers has been confirmed in a multisite cohort of subjects and can be improved in clinical settings. Efforts on harmonization of procedures should be encouraged to optimize the accuracy of CSF biomarkers in AD. © 2013 The Alzheimer's Association. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dumurgier, J., Vercruysse, O., Paquet, C., Bombois, S., Chaulet, C., Laplanche, J. L., … Gabelle, A. (2013). Intersite variability of CSF Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers in clinical setting. Alzheimer’s and Dementia, 9(4), 406–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2012.06.006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free