Vorinostat and bortezomib as third-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A Wisconsin Oncology Network Phase II study

37Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: The primary objective of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of vorinostat and bortezomib as third-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods: Eligibility criteria included recurrent/metastatic NSCLC, having received 2 prior systemic regimens, and performance status 0-2. Patients took vorinostat 400 mg PO daily days 1-14 and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV day 1, 4, 8 and 11 in a 21-day cycle. Primary endpoint was 3-month progression free survival (3m-PFS), with a goal of at least 40% of patients being free of progression at that time point. This study followed a two-stage minimax design. Results: Eighteen patients were enrolled in the first stage. All patients had two prior lines of treatment. Patients received a median of two treatment cycles (range: 1-6) on study. There were no anti-tumor responses; stable disease was observed in 5 patients (27.8%). Median PFS was 1.5 months, 3m-PFS rate 11.1%, and median overall survival 4.7 months. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were thrombocytopenia and fatigue. Two patients who had baseline taxane-related grade 1 peripheral neuropathy developed grade 3 neuropathy. The study was closed at its first interim analysis for lack of efficacy. Conclusions: Bortezomib and vorinostat displayed minimal anti-tumor activity as third-line therapy in NSCLC. We do not recommend this regimen for further investigation in unselected patients. © Springer Science+Business Media 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hoang, T., Campbell, T. C., Zhang, C., Kim, K. M., Kolesar, J. M., Oettel, K. R., … Traynor, A. M. (2014). Vorinostat and bortezomib as third-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A Wisconsin Oncology Network Phase II study. Investigational New Drugs, 32(1), 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-013-9980-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free