A Comparison of Strategies for Source-Free Domain Adaptation

11Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Data sharing restrictions are common in NLP, especially in the clinical domain, but there is limited research on adapting models to new domains without access to the original training data, a setting known as source-free domain adaptation. We take algorithms that traditionally assume access to the source-domain training data-active learning, self-training, and data augmentation-and adapt them for source-free domain adaptation. Then we systematically compare these different strategies across multiple tasks and domains. We find that active learning yields consistent gains across all SemEval 2021 Task 10 tasks and domains, but though the shared task saw successful self-trained and data augmented models, our systematic comparison finds these strategies to be unreliable for source-free domain adaptation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Su, X., Zhao, Y., & Bethard, S. (2022). A Comparison of Strategies for Source-Free Domain Adaptation. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 8352–8367). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.572

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free