Abstract
The Constitution is founded on a certain ratio. The authors postulate that it is possible to notice a theoretical syncretism in the Constitution of Chile (iusnaturalism, neoliberalism and instrumental democracy), that generates a contradiction in the text. The Chilean system is conditioned by the original interpretation. However, the material content of the Constitution evolves with the political consensus present on the people as constituent power. In consequence, the criteria of the Ortúzar Commission lacks of all relevance in the constitutional interpretation, because of their absence of democratic legitimacy and the lack of representativity of the political consensus that the constituent power, the people, renders for the constitutional dispositions. © 2009 Universidad Austral de Chile. Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Mercado, J. B., & Álvarez, C. V. (2008). Contradicciones de los fundamentos teóricos de la constitución Chilena con el estado constitucional: Notas para su reinterpretación. Revista de Derecho, 21(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-09502008000200006
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.