CtDNA Clearance and Radiographic Resolution of Disease in Response to Dual Checkpoint Inhibition in Metastatic Microsatellite Stable Colorectal Cancer with a High Tumor Mutation Burden

0Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Immunotherapy (IO) has increasingly been demonstrated to provide therapeutic benefit to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, only a subset of mCRC tumors respond to IO. Monitoring response with tumor biomarkers like carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) has been challenging in patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) mCRC due to low expression of CEA (CEA/lo). Noninvasive blood-based biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can inform early treatment response and augment radiographic monitoring. We describe a case study of a patient with chemotherapy-refractory CEA/lo MSS mCRC, with metastatic disease present in a cardiophrenic lymph node. The patient was given 2 cycles of combination IO (ipilimumab/nivolumab). Response was monitored by ctDNA using a multiplex PCR next-generation sequencing assay, CEA, and CT scan. After IO administration, ctDNA levels rapidly declined, becoming undetectable. This was concurrent with radiographic resolution of the lymph node metastasis. Serial monitoring of CEA during this same period was uninformative, with no significant changes observed. Significant decline in ctDNA identified metastatic response to IO in a patient with CEA/lo, MSS mCRC and was concurrently validated by CT scan. This case study provides evidence that ctDNA can be used as a prospective surrogate for radiographic tumor response.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schneider, C. J., Krainock, M., Malashevich, A. K., Malhotra, M., Olshan, P., Billings, P. R., & Aleshin, A. (2021). CtDNA Clearance and Radiographic Resolution of Disease in Response to Dual Checkpoint Inhibition in Metastatic Microsatellite Stable Colorectal Cancer with a High Tumor Mutation Burden. Case Reports in Oncology, 14(2), 849–853. https://doi.org/10.1159/000516190

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free