Low molecular weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin for thromboprophylaxis in patients with acute atrial fibrillation: A randomized control trial

15Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

While long-term anticoagulation prevents ischemic stroke in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the optimal initial anti-thrombotic regime in acute AF is less well defined. We randomized 96 patients with new onset acute AF in an emergency admission ward to receive (1) once-daily preparation of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), tinzaparin or (2) conventional intravenous unfractionated heparin (target APTT 5070 s). 5 patients in unfractionated heparin group compared with no patients in LMWH group (0%, P = 0.04) developed ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack during the first 48 h. An initial subcutaneous LMWH was safe and effective in ischemic stroke prevention in patients with acute AF. © 2011 Informa UK, Ltd.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Siu, C. W., Jim, M. H., Lau, C. P., & Tse, H. F. (2011). Low molecular weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin for thromboprophylaxis in patients with acute atrial fibrillation: A randomized control trial. Acute Cardiac Care, 13(3), 196–198. https://doi.org/10.3109/17482941.2011.567283

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free