Monetary financing–the issuance of public money to support public expenditure–remains a widespread policy taboo. In this article, we analyze the operational practices of the Bank of England, the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank (ECB) from the 20th onwards to argue that monetary finance should be understood as a conventional and legitimate part of central banks’ core functions. We argue that monetary financing serves a crucial macro-financial role in the face of large fluctuations in the demand for and supply of government debt, where the central bank acts to stabilize sovereign debt markets. We show that monetary financing has been a stable and pervasive feature of the Bank of England’s and the Federal Reserve’s operations. Turning to the ECB, we show that by the mid-2000s the view came to dominate the institution that the central bank should allow markets to punish governments for excessive deficits. This view informed the ECB’s catastrophic reluctance to act on the 2008 and 2009 Financial Crisis deficits. By 2020 that attitude had once again largely been abandoned.
CITATION STYLE
Bateman, W., & van ‘t Klooster, J. (2024). The dysfunctional taboo: monetary financing at the Bank of England, the Federal Reserve, and the European Central Bank. Review of International Political Economy, 31(2), 413–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2023.2205656
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.