Comparison of radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and wire localization for non-palpable breast cancers: A meta-analysis

113Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Four randomized trials encompassing 449 patients of non-palpable breast cancer undergoing with radio-guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) or wire guided localization (WGL). In the fixed effects model, accurate localization, peri-procedural complications, and reoperation rate were comparable between two techniques. Risk of having positive resection margins following WGL was higher. Duration of localization and surgical excision was shorter for ROLL. Volume and weight of the excised occult breast lesion was similar in WGL and ROLL groups. Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sajid, M. S., Parampalli, U., Haider, Z., & Bonomi, R. (2012, June 15). Comparison of radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and wire localization for non-palpable breast cancers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Surgical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free