Abstract
Background & Aims: Recommendations for patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) include endoscopic surveillance with esophagectomy for early-stage cancer, although new technologies to ablate dysplasia and metaplasia are available. This study compares the cost utility of ablation with that of endoscopic surveillance strategies. Methods: A decision analysis model was created to examine a population of patients with BE (mean age 50), with separate analyses for patients with no dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia (LGD), or high-grade dysplasia (HGD). Strategies compared were no endoscopic surveillance; endoscopic surveillance with ablation for incident dysplasia; immediate ablation followed by endoscopic surveillance in all patients or limited to patients in whom metaplasia persisted; and esophagectomy. Ablation modalities modeled included radiofrequency, argon plasma coagulation, multipolar electrocoagulation, and photodynamic therapy. Results: Endoscopic ablation for patients with HGD could increase life expectancy by 3 quality-adjusted years at an incremental cost of
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Inadomi, J. M., Somsouk, M., Madanick, R. D., Thomas, J. P., & Shaheen, N. J. (2009). A Cost-Utility Analysis of Ablative Therapy for Barrett’s Esophagus. Gastroenterology, 136(7). https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.062
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.