A Cost-Utility Analysis of Ablative Therapy for Barrett's Esophagus

163Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background & Aims: Recommendations for patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) include endoscopic surveillance with esophagectomy for early-stage cancer, although new technologies to ablate dysplasia and metaplasia are available. This study compares the cost utility of ablation with that of endoscopic surveillance strategies. Methods: A decision analysis model was created to examine a population of patients with BE (mean age 50), with separate analyses for patients with no dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia (LGD), or high-grade dysplasia (HGD). Strategies compared were no endoscopic surveillance; endoscopic surveillance with ablation for incident dysplasia; immediate ablation followed by endoscopic surveillance in all patients or limited to patients in whom metaplasia persisted; and esophagectomy. Ablation modalities modeled included radiofrequency, argon plasma coagulation, multipolar electrocoagulation, and photodynamic therapy. Results: Endoscopic ablation for patients with HGD could increase life expectancy by 3 quality-adjusted years at an incremental cost of

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Inadomi, J. M., Somsouk, M., Madanick, R. D., Thomas, J. P., & Shaheen, N. J. (2009). A Cost-Utility Analysis of Ablative Therapy for Barrett’s Esophagus. Gastroenterology, 136(7). https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.062

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free