The Added Value of Bloodpool SPECT/CT in Painful Non-Operated Foot and Ankle Undiagnosed With Standard Three-Phase Bone Scintigraphy

12Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the interest of adding a bloodpool SPECT/CT to standard three-phase bone scintigraphy (BS) for etiological diagnosis of subacute and chronic lower extremity pains. Methods: We prospectively included patients addressed for pain of lower extremities lasting for at least 6 weeks, without previous surgery. They underwent a standard three-phase BS including late phase SPECT/CT, modified with an additional bloodpool SPECT/CT acquisition. Two independent physicians interpreted the images provided by both protocols. Diagnostic conclusion, diagnostic confidence, and interrater agreements were compared. Results: One hundred and eighteen lower extremities from 113 patients were analyzed (71 men, median age of 53 years). Adding bloodpool SPECT/CT to standard three-phase BS changed diagnostic conclusions in 24.6% (29/118) of lower extremities. The modified protocol revealed at least one diagnostic conclusion explaining the pain in 89% of extremities, rather than 83.1% with the standard protocol (p = 0.02). Tendinopathies were diagnosed in 12.7% of lower extremities, rather than 4.2% with standard BS (p = 0.002). Adding bloodpool SPECT/CT substantially increased overall confidence of each reader (p < 0.001). Inter-reader agreement was not significantly impacted. Conclusion: Adding bloodpool SPECT/CT to standard three-phase BS impacted diagnostic conclusion in a quarter of the patients with painful lower extremities, notably by revealing significantly more tendonitis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cuvilliers, C., Palard-Novello, X., Pontoizeau, C., Meneret, P., Devillers, A., Le Jeune, F., & Girard, A. (2021). The Added Value of Bloodpool SPECT/CT in Painful Non-Operated Foot and Ankle Undiagnosed With Standard Three-Phase Bone Scintigraphy. Frontiers in Medicine, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.634419

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free