Underlying assumptions in team effectiveness research: An application of problematization methodology

3Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper examines current assumptions underlying the team effectiveness literature so as to propose alternative assumptions. Problematization methodology was used to problematize the existing assumptions. Integral Framework was applied to categorize constructs of team effectiveness literature. Alternative assumptions were proposed along with a discussion on their theory generation potential and the potential audience to whom these assumptions would be of benefit. Results of the application of problematization methodology and integral framework have problematized the three current assumptions, i.e.“experienced meaningfulness”, “outside-in” view of team processes, and the impact of “structure on behavior” of team members. Alternative assumptions of “felt meaningfulness”, inside-out’ view of team processes, and the impact of “culture of leadership on behavior” of team members have resulted in relevant research propositions. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed along with theoretical and managerial implications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prabhu K.P, N., Pai, R. Y., & Abhishek, A. S. (2019). Underlying assumptions in team effectiveness research: An application of problematization methodology. Cogent Economics and Finance, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2019.1658418

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free