An association between clotting factor concentrates use and mortality in human immunodeficiency virus-infected hemophilic patients

14Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is much evidence that clotting factor concentrates (CFC), especially the so-called intermediate-purity preparations, exert an immunomodulating effect in vitro. The impact of this effect on the outcome of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in hemophiliacs is still controversial. In this retrospective cohort study, the effects of treatment with CFC on mortality and progression to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) were estimated while controlling for individual risk factors. Logistic regression end survival analysis, including the Cox proportional-hazards regression model, were performed with data from a 11-year follow-up of 225 hemophilia patients seropositive for HIV type 1 (HIV-1) of two hemophilia centers. Mortality and progression to AIDS rates were strongly associated with lower administration of CFC. After adjusting for age, a statistically significant and robust association was observed. The use of CFC was negatively associated with progression to AIDS (P = .0252) and mortality (P = .0033). The adjusted relative hazards of mortality and progression to AIDS rate between the most treated patients (>700 IU/kg/yr) versus the least treated (≤700 IU/kg/yr) were 0.53 (confidence limits, 0.33 to 0.86) and 0.57 (0.39 to 0.84), respectively. Although the effects of other unmeasured risk factors cannot be excluded with certainty, these results suggest that there is a negative association between treatment with CFC and progression to AIDS and mortality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Montoro, J. B., Oliveras, J., Lorenzo, J. I., Tusell, J. M., Altisent, C., Molina, R., & Ayestarán, A. I. (1995). An association between clotting factor concentrates use and mortality in human immunodeficiency virus-infected hemophilic patients. Blood, 86(6), 2213–2219. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v86.6.2213.bloodjournal8662213

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free