Consensus on Reducing Risk in Total Joint Arthroplasty: Revision Surgery

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Rates of revision hip and knee arthroplasty continue to increase. Patients undergoing revision hip and knee arthroplasty face a different set of challenges than those undergoing primary arthroplasties, with increased rates of medical and surgical complications. Specifically, patients undergoing revision arthroplasty have higher rates transfusion, more unplanned readmissions, greater cardiac and renal complications, and more frequent surgical complications including surgical site infections and need for reoperation and revision surgery. Multiple strategies may be used in an effort to lower these risks, including shifting these surgeries to higher volume medical centers and surgeons, vigorously optimizing revision arthroplasty patients in the preoperative setting, using blood conserving strategies including universal use of tranexamic acid and selective use of blood cell salvage and reinfusion, and closed-incision negative wound pressure therapy to decrease rates of wound complications and surgical site infections.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hickernell, T. R., & Cooper, H. J. (2019). Consensus on Reducing Risk in Total Joint Arthroplasty: Revision Surgery. In Techniques in Orthopaedics (Vol. 34, pp. 216–221). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/BTO.0000000000000395

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free