Pro-Con Debate: Role of Methadone in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols - Superior Analgesic or Harmful Drug?

16Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are standardized and designed to provide superior analgesia, reduce opioid consumption, improve patient recovery, and reduce hospital length of stay. Yet, moderate-to-severe postsurgical pain continues to afflict over 40% of patients and remains a major priority for anesthesia research. Methadone administration in the perioperative setting may reduce postoperative pain scores and have opioid-sparing effects, which may be beneficial for enhanced recovery. Methadone possesses a multimodal profile consisting of µ-opioid agonism, N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonism, and reuptake inhibition of serotonin and norepinephrine. Furthermore, it may attenuate the development of chronic postsurgical pain. However, caution is advised with perioperative use of methadone in specific high-risk patient populations and surgical settings. Methadone's wide pharmacokinetic variability, opioid-related adverse effects, and potential negative impact on cost-effectiveness may also limit its use in the perioperative setting. In this PRO-CON commentary article, the authors debate whether methadone should be incorporated in ERAS protocols to provide superior analgesia with no increased risks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

D’Souza, R. S., Esfahani, K., & Dunn, L. K. (2023). Pro-Con Debate: Role of Methadone in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols - Superior Analgesic or Harmful Drug? Anesthesia and Analgesia, 137(1), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000006331

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free